Directors of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Abila
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County denying a new trial as to certain issues. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Upon motion for a new trial herein the court made an order that said motion be granted “ as to the issue whether or not the petition for the organization of Fallbrook irrigation district, mentioned in the findings, was signed by-fifty freeholders owning land in said district, and that upon said new trial said issue only he re-examined. And it is further ordered that said motion be denied as to all other, issues raised by the pleadings.” From that portion of the order *369denying the motion for a new trial the defendant, Abila, has appealed.
By the fifth section of the statute under which the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Varney v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Dyer v. BroganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. SealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- United States v. Certain Parcels of Land SituateDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
- Kenworthy v. MastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Mountain Tunnel Gravel Mining Co. v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ahern v. Board of Directors of High Line Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.