Dyer v. Brogan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The plaintiff sued to recover judgment on a street assessment.
The only finding of the court below was: “That the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco did not, on the fourteenth day of November, 1876, or at any other time, adopt or pass any resolution ordering the street work mentioned in the complaint to be done, and that said street work, viz., the grading of Vallejo Street from Larkin to Polk Street, was never ordered by said board to be performed, by resolution or otherwise. And as a conclusion of law, I find that defendant, M. Brogan, is entitled to…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Sackett v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Windhaus v. BootzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Diefendorff v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.