Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Hanford v. Morganthaler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1922No. Docket No. 111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff commenced a suit in Wayne county against defendant to recover an amount due on several promissory notes. Subsequently it commenced a garnishee proceeding against The People’s State Bank and the Detroit Packing Company. As a basis for this garnishee suit it filed the following affidavit:

“Title of Cause and Court.
“State of Michigan, )
“County of Wayne ) ’
“Clifton G. Dyer, of Detroit, Michigan, being duly sworn, deposes and says, that he is agent and attorney for the plaintiff in the above entitled cause; that said cause was commenced in the said circuit court for the county of Wayne,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weber v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Ettelsohn v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Milwaukee Bridge & Iron Works v. BrevoortMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Acme Lumber Co. v. Modern Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Prussian National Insurance v. EisenhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fildew v. StockardMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bahr v. American RailroadSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1943
  3. Pere Marquette Ry. Co. v. Western Heater DispatchDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
  4. Phillips v. Belt Automobile Indemnity Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Bahr v. American Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API