In Re Glaser
Supreme Court of the United States
ORIGINAL. The facts are, stated in the opinion. Mandamus lies to compel the Circuit Court to take jurisdiction. Railroad Co. v. Wiswell, 22 Wall. 507; Ex parte Schollenberger, 96 U. S. 369; Re Pennsylvania Co., 137 U. S. 451; Matter of Hohorst, 150 U. S. 653; Re Grossmeyer, 177 U. S. 48. Petitioner cannot appeal from any decision of the Circuit Court of the Eastern District of New York for the reason that the court has refused to. take jurisdiction.
Read the full summary
ORIGINAL. The facts are, stated in the opinion. Mandamus lies to compel the Circuit Court to take jurisdiction. Railroad Co. v. Wiswell, 22 Wall. 507; Ex parte Schollenberger, 96 U. S. 369; Re Pennsylvania Co., 137 U. S. 451; Matter of Hohorst, 150 U. S. 653; Re Grossmeyer, 177 U. S. 48. Petitioner cannot appeal from any decision of the Circuit Court of the Eastern District of New York for the reason that the court has refused to. take jurisdiction. If there is no action pending, there is no such thing as a. proceeding to compel the filing of an answer to compel the', placing of the case…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
This is a petition by Gertrude'Glaser,; as administratrix, for mandamus, requiring the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York to take jurisdiction and proceed against Anthony P. Langer in a certain suit alleged by petitioner to. be pending and undetermined in that court, wherein Gertrude Glaser,...as administratrix, is plaintiff,, and Anthony P. Langer is defendant, and to strike from the records of the court a certain order made on the fourteenth day of November, 1904, entitled: “ 'In the Matter of the Application, of Gertrude Glaser,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Commonwealth of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Magnum Import Co. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Wabash Ry. Co. v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- In re MacfarlandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
- Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.