Legal Opinion
Ex Parte United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 5, 1932No. 19PublishedCited by 217 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
This is an application for a writ of mandamus requiring the federal district judge sitting in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the court itself to set aside an order denying a petition of the United States attorney for the issue of a bench warrant for the arrest of Joseph V. Wingert, [see United States v. Wingert, 55 F. (2d) 960] and directing that such bench warrant be issued. The case is here for decision upon the return of the court and judge to a rule to show cause why the application for the writ should not be granted. The facts follow.
On…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.