Legal Opinion

Magnum Import Co. v. Coty

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 7, 1923No. 978, 979, 980, 982, 981PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

All these cases involve the question how far the purchasers of perfumes made by manufacturers whose perfumes have gained a high reputation with the public may use the name and trade-mark of such manufacturers in re-bottling or repacking and selling them when, as claimed by the manufacturers and owners of the trade-mark, the process of rebottling and repacking injures the perfumes and impairs the value of the trade-mark and the reputation of the manufacturers. In a case presenting a similar question, to wit, Prestonettes, Inc. v. Coty, 260 U. S. 720, this Court granted a writ of certiorari,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McIntire v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. In Re Commonwealth of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. In Re GlaserSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  2. Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. In Re 620 Church Street Building Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Barnes v. E-Systems, Inc. Group Hospital Medical & Surgical Ins. PlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API