Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Republic of Peru
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 5, 1943No. 13, OriginalPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
318 U.S. 578 (1943)
EX PARTE REPUBLIC OF PERU.
No. 13, original.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 1, 1943.
Decided April 5, 1943.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND/OR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS.
Mr. Edgar R. Kraetzer, with whom Mr. Monte M. Lemann was on the brief, for petitioner.
Mr. Joseph M. Rault, with whom Messrs. George H. Terriberry and Walter Carroll were on the brief, for Galban Lobo Co., S.A., et al., respondents.
2Opinion of the Court · StoneChief Justice Stone
This is a motion for leave to file in this Court the petition of the Republic of Peru for a writ of prohibition or of mandamus. The petition…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited68 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Christopher Dickson v. Alan YochelsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019