Legal Opinion

City of Hillsdale v. Hillsdale Iron & Metal Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1960No. Docket 1, Calendar 47,150PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Defendant appeals from decree restraining it from operating its scrap yard in a residential zone in plaintiff city in a manner held to constitute an extension of a permitted nonconforming use and a nuisance. We affirm. The individual plaintiffs occupy neighboring residences.

Defendant’s first main contention is that the zoning ordinance in question is, as applied to its property, unreasonable and unconstitutional for a numjber of reasons, which we consider seriatim.(1) The ordinance zones defendant’s property and the area around it for single residence use only. It also provides that no lot…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Stevenson v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Portage Township v. Full Salvation UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Cole v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Norton Shores v. CarrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Township of White Lake v. LustigMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Reid v. City of SouthfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Krause v. City of Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API