Legal Opinion
Reid v. City of Southfield
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided December 1, 1967No. Docket 1,648PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lesinski, O. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment below wherein the court found the zoning ordinances of the defendant city 1 here in controversy to be reasonable and constitutional as applied to plaintiffs’ property and ordered plaintiffs’ complaint, which sought an opposite determination, dismissed.
' Plaintiffs have owned and operated a greenhouse, flower, and general nursery business on a portion of their multi-parcel property located on the west side of Southfield road, between Twelve Mile road and Twelve and One-half Mile road in the city of South-field, Michigan, since 1929. Their…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Janesick v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Alderton v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sun Oil Co. v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Trever v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Sturdy Homes, Inc. v. Redford TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Brandau v. City of Grosse Pointe ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Krause v. City of Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.