Legal Opinion

Christopher v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1936No. Civ. 10136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAAS, J., pro tem.

The plaintiff, a widow, brought suit for damages alleged by her to have been sustained by reason of the loss of her husband, who died following injuries received as the result of an accident which occurred while he was standing, or walking, at the south end of a pedestrian zone at the northwest corner of Twelfth Street and South Broadway in Los Angeles, on the 26th day of July, 1933. No negligence is attached to the deceased. Two motor vehicles are involved in this accident: a truck belonging to the defendant city, used to pick up cans, which was traveling west on Twelfth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thoreau v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Gamberg v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Hughes v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Elliott v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Livingston v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Rogers v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API