Elliott v. Market Street Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
The complaint charged that while respondent was standing on Market Street at its intersection with Montgomery Street, in San Francisco, appellant so negligently operated its street car westerly on Market Street as to cause it to collide with respondent, thereby inflicting upon her personal injuries. The answer denied such negligence and affirmatively alleged her negligence. The jury returned its verdict awarding damages to her. From the judgment entered thereon, appellant appeals upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. In support thereof…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Driscoll v. Market Street Cable RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Thoreau v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hughes v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gilmore v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Christopher v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941