Legal Opinion

Gamberg v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1934No. Civ. No. 9180PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

This is a proceeding to review a decision of the respondent commission denying petitioner’s application for compensation for an injury which he claims to have sustained in the course of his employment.

It is conceded by respondents that at the time the application was filed, heard and determined, petitioner was suffering from a left inguinal hernia; but the refusal to compensate him therefor was based upon a finding of the referee that the same was not “caused or exacerbated by injury arising out of and in the course of” his employment.

At the time the injury is alleged to have happened…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winthrop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Houghton v. Loma Prieta Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Thoreau v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Singer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Barton v. McDermottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Brant v. Retirement Board of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Young v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Murray v. San Leandro Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API