Legal Opinion

Murray v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided January 17, 2008No. 03-06-00770-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice.

Appellant Christopher Richard Murray was found guilty pursuant to a plea agree ment to the class B misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04 (West 2003). Prior to his plea, appellant filed a motion to suppress evidence that the trial court denied. In one point of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. We overrule appellant’s point of error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant was involved in a single vehicle collision in Travis…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. State v. SteelmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. State v. HardyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Ramos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kirsch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  2. Hector L. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Brian Thomas Kirsch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  4. Gary Noria v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. Huse, HaydenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API