Legal Opinion

Ramos v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 2003No. 2-03-037-CRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM J. DAY, Justice (Retired).

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant Kristina Ramos pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to the Class B misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated (DWI). Prior to her plea, appellant filed a motion to suppress all blood evidence obtained following her accident and all results of any testing of such evidence. The trial court entered an order denying appellant’s motion to suppress, which contained findings of fact and conclusions of law. In eight issues, appellant claims the trial court erred in its ruling. We affirm.

II. FACTUAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND

On March…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. KellyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Kevin DWayne Kennemur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  3. Kirsch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  4. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  5. Murray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API