Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2003No. 02-222PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[T1] John Arthur Taylor, Jr., appeals the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his pro se "Petition to Show Cause Why Judgement [sic] is Not Void." Taylor had filed that petition to challenge his 1997 conviction and sentence for possession of a deadly weapon with unlawful intent. Finding that the district court was without jurisdiction to consider Taylor's petition, we dismiss this appeal as well.

ISSUES

[T2] In this pro se appeal, Taylor does not expressly state any issues in his brief. We discern his issue to be whether his 1997 conviction and sentencing are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steve Paul Wilson, A/K/A Mike L. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kallas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Nixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Kitzke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Snow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Van Haele v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bear Cloud v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Moore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Belden v. LampertWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API