Legal Opinion
Zito v. Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, LLP
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 19, 2012No. 09 Civ. 9662PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver and Jacobson, LLP (“Fried Frank” or the “Defendant”) has moved pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment dismissing the first amended complaint (the “Complaint”) of the plaintiff Roseanne Zito (“Zito” or the “Plaintiff’) alleging claims for age, gender and disability discrimination and retaliation. Upon the facts and conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted, and the Complaint is dismissed.
I. Prior Proceedings
Zito filed her initial complaint on October 22, 2009 and her…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Moccio v. Cornell UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Vuona v. Merrill Lynch & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Miron v. Town of StratfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Wang v. Phoenix Satellite Television US, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Delaney v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.