Legal Opinion

People v. Roland

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1960No. Crim. 3747PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, after jury trial, of two violations of section 11500, Health and Safety Code: (1) unlawful possession, and (2) transportation of marijuana.

Questions Presented

1. Was there reasonable cause for the arrest and search without a warrant?

2. Were the acts charged legally one inseparable act?

Evidence

Except as affected by the determination of the above legal questions, defendant does not claim that the evidence is not sufficient to support his conviction. An informant, one Baker, was confined in the San Mateo County jail on a charge filed by his wife.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People v. BoylesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. DewsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Biggart v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People v. HollidayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. CedenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Dunn v. MUNICIPAL COURT FOR EUREKA JUDICIAL DISTRICTCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. People v. SwayzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. MelchorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API