Legal Opinion
Dunn v. MUNICIPAL COURT FOR EUREKA JUDICIAL DISTRICT
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 7, 1963No. Civ. 20534PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.
Petitioner, James Dunn, appeals from an order denying his application for a writ of mandamus directing the municipal court to quash a search warrant on the ground that it was invalidly issued.
Question Presented
Was the affidavit upon which the search warrant was based sufficient? We have concluded that this question must he answered in the negative.
Statement of the Case
The petition for a writ of mandate alleges, substantially, as follows: That petitioner has been accused in the municipal court of a violation of section 3081 of the Fish and Game Code; that on or about the 18th day of December,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Willson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. StoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Flack v. Municipal Court for the Anaheim-Fullerton Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Dulaney v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. AdayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.