Turner v. Turner
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
— This was a suit to foreclose a vendor’s lien to secure the amount of six promissory notes. One of the defenses was, that the notes had been paid; and the trial court found this to be the fact. The counsel for the appellant contend that this finding is not supported by the evidence. But we think that the evidence must be held to be sufficient to support it.
The notes were made by one J. T. Turner to his brother Robert Turner, whose administrator is the plaintiff here. Both brothers were dead before the suit was commenced; and there was no direct evidence for or against the payment.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carroll v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
- Lipscomb v. DeLemosSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Haywood v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
3Cited by7 opinions
- Light v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- First National Bank of Seattle v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Vesel v. Polich Trading Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Shammas v. BoyettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Rock Island Plow Co. v. BaldersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.