Legal Opinion
Shammas v. Boyett
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 12, 1952No. Civ. 18878PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATROSSO, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant R. A. Boyett, doing business as R. A. Boyett Automobile Finance, in an action wherein plaintiff sought to recover from the respondent and others the sum of $3,900. The defendants other than the respondent suffered their defaults to be entered and judgment thereon was entered against them, which has since become final.
The facts of the case as disclosed by the evidence with but little, if any, conflict are as follows: Appellant, who is engaged in the business of buying and selling used…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Schultz v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Bank of RutherfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- American Hominy Co. v. Millikin Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Central Bank and Trust Company v. General Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Bank of Marin v. John M. England, Trustee in Bankruptcy in the Matter of Marin Seafoods, Inc. And Eureka Fisheries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Richmond Teachers Credit Union v. James F. Waters, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960