Beeney v. Irwin
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County. ■ '
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.
This was a proceeding by way of mandamus brought by Irwin, the appellee, against the treasurer of Washington county, to compel him to pay two county orders, which were set out in his petition. It may be suggested that what are gathered from the petition and answer and stated as facts are expressly made such by stipulation of parties. Both have agreed that whatever is contained in either may be taken as true. Each has stated in his pleading whatever he believed necessary for the maintenance or defense of the proceeding.
Continuing with the statement, it appears that in July, 1892, the chairman…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- El Dorado County v. ElstnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Connor v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by9 opinions
- Forbes v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- State ex rel. Lockwood v. TylerMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- First National Bank of Northampton v. ArthurColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
- Rio Grande Junction Railway Co. v. Orchard Mesa Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Mugrage v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.