Legal Opinion
First National Bank of Northampton v. Arthur
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 15, 1897No. 1435PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
This was a proceeding in mandamus originally instituted against Edwin F. Arthur, treasurer of the city of Denver, as defendant; his term of office having expired, Paul J. Sours, his successor was, upon motion in this court substituted as defendant. The action grows out of the construction of a *284sewer in the Twentieth street sewer district, in the city of Denver, authorized by city ordinance, passed in April, 1882.
It appears that petitioner was the owner of certain warrants, numbered from 164 to 171 inclusive, issued on April 6, 1883, to the sewer contractor and that on April 7,1883, they were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Roberts' adm'or v. CockeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
- Stoddard v. BentonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Beeney v. IrwinColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
- Travelers' Ins. Co. v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- General Motors Corporation v. BlevinsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1956
- Voorhees v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- First National Bank v. ArthurColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
- Vandever v. EmeryColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- First National Bank v. ArthurColorado Court of Appeals · 1898