Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lockwood v. Tyler

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1922No. 5,115PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farr

Original application for a writ of mmdamus based upon a petition alleging substantially as follows: That the relators, Lockwood and Blakeslee, as copartners, entered into a contract *126with Sheridan county for the classification of certain lands in that county under the provisions of Chapter 89, Session Laws of 1919, sixteenth legislative assembly. During the performance of the work, an injunction suit was brought by one Clair Stoner for the purpose of testing the validity of the contract and the legislative Act under the authority of which it was made. The district court, after a hearing,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Richman v. Supervisors Muscatine CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  3. Spratt v. Helena Power Transmission Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Holliday v. O'LearyMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. In re PomeroyMontana Supreme Court · 1915

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Loew v. Hagerle BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. State Ex Rel. Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Maryland Classified Employees Ass'n v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. School District No. 29 v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API