Legal Opinion

Paul E. Volpp Tractor Parts, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided August 3, 1995No. 86-2871-TUAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TURNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Paul E. Volpp Tractor Parts, Inc. (“Volpp”) d/b/a CEM Supply Company (“CEM”), filed this action alleging federal and state antitrust violations as well as several state common law claims against defendant Caterpillar, Inc. (“Caterpillar”). Volpp subsequently filed an amended complaint. The essence of the claim is that Caterpillar entered into unlawful arrangements with authorized Caterpillar dealers in which Caterpillar conditioned the sale of its machines upon dealers’ agreements to purchase genuine Caterpillar…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Card & Novelty, Inc. v. Lawson Mardon Label, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Bepco, Inc. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000
  3. Thompson v. UGL UNICCO SERVICE CO.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
  4. Daniel Sherwood v. MicrosoftCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. Southern Card v Lawson Mardon LabelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API