Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Quik-Trip Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 12, 1982No. 79-1843PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
The Secretary of Labor brought this action under §§ 16(c) and 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 216(c) and 217, seeking to enjoin defendants from violating overtime compensation provisions of the FLSA and to recover back wages and liquidated damages for the employees affected. The Secretary alleged that defendants Quik-Trip and William Bell had filed with the Department of Labor “reports of retroactive payment of overtime compensation” which defendants Quik-Trip and Bell knew to be materially false, in violation of 29 U.S.C. §§ 211(c) and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brennan v. HeardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Virginia Baptist Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Tiller Helicopter Services, Inc. And William J. Tiller, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Reich v. Monfort, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- American Waste Removal Co. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Saenz Mencia v. AllredCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Chellen v. John Pickle Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.