Legal Opinion

C.O. v. W.S.

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided March 1, 1994No. 9370463PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peter M. Sikora, Judge.

I. Statement of Facts

Defendant, W.S., and her female partner decided that they wished to have a baby. After discussing their wish with plaintiff, C.O., and his male partner, it was agreed that plaintiff would provide the semen for defendant to conceive a child. It is undisputed that plaintiff provided the semen on one or more occasions and that defendant was impregnated with the semen other than through direct sexual intercourse. As a result of the insemination, on December 25, 1992, defendant gave birth to D.C., the subject of these proceedings. It is further agreed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. In the Interest of R.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Jhordan C. v. MARY K.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. McIntyre v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. C. M. v. C. C.Cumberland County Family Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. A.A.B. v. B.O.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. In Re KMHSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. In Re R.A.s, Ca2007-01-014 (11-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API