C.O. v. W.S.
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
1Opinion of the Court
Peter M. Sikora, Judge.
I. Statement of Facts
Defendant, W.S., and her female partner decided that they wished to have a baby. After discussing their wish with plaintiff, C.O., and his male partner, it was agreed that plaintiff would provide the semen for defendant to conceive a child. It is undisputed that plaintiff provided the semen on one or more occasions and that defendant was impregnated with the semen other than through direct sexual intercourse. As a result of the insemination, on December 25, 1992, defendant gave birth to D.C., the subject of these proceedings. It is further agreed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In the Interest of R.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Jhordan C. v. MARY K.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- McIntyre v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- C. M. v. C. C.Cumberland County Family Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- A.A.B. v. B.O.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- In Re KMHSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- In Re R.A.s, Ca2007-01-014 (11-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.