Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Crouch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 13, 1989No. 2109-F; CA A44574PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*464NEWMAN, J.

In this filiation action, ORS 109.124 et seq, petitioner appeals a summary judgment that declared that he has no parental rights as to the child that respondent, an unmarried woman, conceived by artificial insemination with petitioner’s semen. Respondent contested petitioner’s action to be declared the child’s father. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Petitioner assigns as errors that the court granted respondent’s motion and denied his motion. The court held that there was no genuine issue of material fact, that ORS 109.239 bars petitioner from obtaining…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. C.O. v. W.S.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1994
  3. E.E. v. O.M.G.R.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  4. Leckie v. VoorhiesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Weaver v. GuinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API