Legal Opinion
In re K.M.H.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided October 26, 2007No. 96,102PublishedCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Beier, J.:
This appeal from a consolidated child in need of care (CINC) case and a paternity action arises out of an artificial insemination leading to the birth of twins K.M.H. and K.C.H. We are called upon to decide the existence and extent of the parental rights of the known sperm donor, who alleges he had an agreement with the children’s mother to act as the twins’ father.
The twins’ mother filed a CINC petition to establish that the donor had no parental rights under Kansas law. The donor sued for determination of his paternity. The district court…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Howard v. Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. Ortega-CadelanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.