Legal Opinion

In Re KMH

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 26, 2007No. 96,102Published

1Opinion of the Court

169 P.3d 1025 (2007)

In the Interest of K.M.H., a child under age eighteen, and K.C.H., a child under age eighteen.

In the Matter of the Paternity of K.C.H. and K.M.H., by and through their next friend, D.H., Appellant, and

S.H., Appellee.

No. 96,102.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

October 26, 2007.

Kurt L. James, of Topeka, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellant.

Susan Barker Andrews, of Topeka, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellee.

Linda Henry Elrod, Distinguished Professor of Law and Director, of Topeka, was on the brief for amicus curiae Washburn University School of Law…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Caplinger; Dissent · Hill.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API