Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Flandro

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1972No. 10994PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

This action arose out of two construction contracts (referred to as Phase 1 and Phase 2) executed by Leslie Mitchell, d/b/a Mitchell Construction Company, (hereinafter referred to as respondent), with C. Ed Flandro, the late Stella Flandro, and C. Ed Flandro, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as appellants) for the construction of an automobile sales and service plant to house appellants’ Ford dealership.1 Other party appellants named, the lessor-owners of the realty on which the sales and service plant was constructed, are passive in this action.

According to the memorandum…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jolley v. Puregro CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Angleton v. AngletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Farm Development Corporation v. HernandezIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Guyman v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bratton v. SliningerIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Opportunity, L.L.C. v. OssewardeIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wing v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Cole v. KunzlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Pierson v. SewellIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API