Legal Opinion

Hollembaek v. Alaska Rural Rehabilitation Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1968No. 866PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBETT, Chief Justice.

OPINION

Appellee sued on appellant’s promissory note which was secured by chattel mortgages on a trailer and certain farm equipment. Attachment of the trailer and a tractor was effected by a peace officer. Agents of appellee went on appellant’s property and peaceably took possession of a combine. After a trial before the court, appellee was granted judgment.

Appellant raises two points on appeal:(1) That the trial court wrongfully denied him the right to trial by jury, and(2) That the trial court erroneously refused to grant judgment to him for appel-lee’s alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Fairbanks Publishing Company v. FranciscoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Mildred O. Ward, Guardian Ad Litem of Robert Fred Ward, a Minor, and Gladys Mitchell v. Myrtle Marie BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Cataldo v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  5. Munkacsy v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Census Federal Credit Union v. WannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Fink v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Marine Midland Bank-Central v. CoteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API