Legal Opinion

Patrick v. Sedwick

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1964No. 314PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AREND, Justice.

The principal issue in this case may be stated as follows: Where a patient had a soft, feminine voice before undergoing a subtotal thyroidectomy but immediately thereafter was found to have permanent paralysis of the left vocal chord, is the inference that the physician who performed the • operation may produce partial or even recurrent laryngeal nerve of the patient sufficient to establish a prima facie case of negligence, notwithstanding the fact that injuries of this type do occur in about one to five percent of the operations performed, regardless of how careful the surgeon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Di Filippo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Hoye v. Century Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. WoodSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Wilson v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Public Health Trust of Dade Cty. v. ValcinSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1966

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API