Legal Opinion

Moran v. Holman

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1973No. 1650PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

We are here confronted with the question of whether, under the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.), a debt is discharged wen the secured party, after the debtor’s default in payments, repossessed a truck, used it for purposes other than its preservation, and did not initiate suit on the debt for a period of approximately four months.

In November of 1967, Rex Holman borrowed $2,050 from Jack Moran to finance the purchase of a used pickup truck. This debt was consolidated with certain prior obligations, and Holman executed a promissory note in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Alaska Foods, Inc. v. American Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Weaver v. O'Meara Motor CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Paskvan v. MesichAlaska Supreme Court · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Wisconics Engineering, Inc. v. FisherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Nelson v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Native Alaskan Reclamation & Pest Control, Inc. v. United Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API