Orlandi v. Gray
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los 'Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This appeal arises upon the foreclosure of two mechanics’ liens. At the trial the actions were consolidated and a single judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs. An appeal is taken from that judgment, and also from an order denying the motion for a new trial. Only two questions of any importance are involved.
*373By the answer of defendant Gray, the owner of the building, it is alleged that the architect,' Bourgeois, was a subcontractor for Pugh & Sons, the original contractors, and that plaintiffs in this action performed the labor and furnished the materials, for which they now Seek a lien, for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- M. Arthur Gensler, Jr., & Associates, Inc. v. Larry Barrett, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Farnham v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Mott v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Baker v. Lake Land Canal & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Munger & Munger v. McBratneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.