Baker v. Lake Land Canal & Irrigation Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County, and from an order denying a new trial. M. L. Short, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Chas. G. Lamberson, and Frank Lamberson, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
J.—The case represents the consolidation of two actions brought to foreclose liens for labor bestowed upon a certain canal and right of way belonging to defendants.
The appeal is from the judgment in favor of plaintiffs and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
About June 25, 1904, appellants entered into a contract with defendants W. B. Livermore and J. W. Livermore, who were doing business as partners under the firm name of Livermore Brothers, under which the latter agreed to construct a certain ditch or canal leading from Kings river in Kings county.
The amount agreed to he paid…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Davies Henderson Lumber Co. v. GottschalkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Marchant v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Roylance v. San Luis Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robison v. MitchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Snellings Lumber Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- McCreary v. Toronto Midway Oil Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Howell v. GundersonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1967