Legal Opinion

M. Arthur Gensler, Jr., & Associates, Inc. v. Larry Barrett, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1972No. S.F. 22863PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCOMB, J.

This is an action to foreclose mechanics’ liens filed, by plaintiffs M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. & Associates, Inc., and Lambert & Wells Construction Company, an architectural firm and a general contractor, respectively, in connection with services performed by them in remodeling the third floor of defendant’s building for its lessee, Tourist Information Program Service (“TIPS”). The issues raised on appeal were first raised in defendant’s trial briefs, filed after the evidence was in.

In late April 1968 Barrett leased 13 offices on the third floor of its premises located at 420…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Nolte v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Scott, Blake & Wynne v. Summit Ridge Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Massoud Bassidji v. Simon Soul Sun GoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. McCabe/Marra Co. v. City of DoverOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Kashani v. TSANN KUEN CHINA ENTERPRISE CO.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Ground Control, LLC v. Capsco Industries, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API