Legal Opinion

Ex parte Burr

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Decided April 15, 1823PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCranch, C. J.

con.) as follows: In the argument of a cause in this Court Mr. Burr was charged, by counsel of great respectability, with practices, unbecoming a practitioner at the bar. It was said that the charges were not made unadvisedly, and could be supported. Mr. Burr denied the truth of the allegations, and challenged an investigation. The Court thought it important to the character both of the accused, and the accusing party, as well as to the purity of the administration of justice, that charges so deliberately made, should not pass without notice. They therefore requested the gentleman, who had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Juilliard v. GreenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API