Legal Opinion

State v. Staten

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 5, 1986No. CX-86-486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This is an appeal by the State from a sentence imposed on respondent Randolph *916Staten. The trial court departed downward durationally from a one year and one day presumptive sentence and imposed 90 days. Finding no substantial and compelling circumstances to justify the departure, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

FACTS

From June to August 1985 Staten wrote 76 checks on a closed account in the Minneapolis area, totaling over $8,000. Staten pleaded guilty to an amended charge of theft over $250. The presumptive sentence, based on a severity II offense and a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. MattsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. CizlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. United States v. BergmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. State v. EsparzaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KebasoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. VahabiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. State v. StatenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API