State v. Staten
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
390 N.W.2d 914 (1986)
STATE of Minnesota, Appellant,
v.
Randolph Wilbert STATEN, Respondent.
No. CX-86-486.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
August 5, 1986.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, Hennepin County Atty., Beverly J. Wolfe, Asst. County Atty., Minneapolis, for appellant.
Kenneth E. Tilsen, St. Paul, for respondent.
Heard by NIERENGARTEN, P.J., and LANSING and HUSPENI, JJ. Considered and decided by the full court sitting en banc.
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This is an appeal by the State from a sentence imposed on respondent Randolph Staten. The trial court departed…
Also in this document: Dissent · Randall; Dissent · Crippen.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. WallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. MattsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. CizlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- United States v. BergmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.