Legal Opinion

State v. Esparza

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1985No. C8-85-170PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This is an appeal by the state from the trial .court’s downward departure of defendant’s sentence, based on defense counsel’s mistaken interpretation of the appropriate guidelines sentence and communication of that misinterpretation to defendant. We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

FACTS

Defendant Douglas Bruce Esparza was convicted of attempted second degree murder and two counts of second degree assault following a jury trial. The presen-tence report recommended that there be no departure from the presumptive guidelines term of 122½ months. (The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Herme v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. BurrellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. State v. StatenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. MixCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State of Minnesota v. Dylan Ronald PlesselCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API