Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bell

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 23, 1955No. 5316PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. Brosman, Judge:

_ Bell, the accused in the case before us, was charged with having committed á rape on July 12, 1953, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 12Qi 50 USC § 714. On August 12-13, 1953, he was tried by a general court-martial, was found, guilty, and was sentenced to receive a dishonorable discharge, as- well as total forfeitures and confinement at hard labor for twenty-rfive years. The convening authority approved the findings and sentence, and on December 11, 1953, a board of review in the office of The Judge Advocate General,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. StrandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. MasseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. BurnsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. GarciaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. FergusonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. KorzeniewskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. United States v. WalkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. SchickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API