Matter of Application of Cencinino
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The petition alleges that the petitioner is illegally held in restraint of his personal liberty by the sheriff of Humboldt County, and the return of that officer shows that he detains and is detaining the petitioner in custody under the authority of a warrant of arrest issued out of the justice’s court of Trinidad township, said county, upon a complaint charging the petitioner with the violation of the provisions of Ordinance No. 118, passed by the board of supervisors of Humboldt County on the sixteenth day of November, 1912, and which, by virtue of a provision therein contained, Went into…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hayes v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ex parte PrindleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Dean v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Wellston Fire Protection District v. State Bank & Trust Co. of WellstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- State v. ToomeyMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- County of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.