In Re Cole
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for discharge upon writ of habeas corpus, under a charge of violation of an ordinance of Sonoma County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Petitioners were charged with the violation of an ordinance entitled “An ordinance prohibiting the casting, extending or setting of any seine or net of any kind for the catching of any fish in any river, stream or slough in the county of Sonoma,” and1 passed by the board of supervisors of said county on the fourteenth day of February, 1899.
The authority of the board to enact said ordinance, its validity when enacted, the sufficiency of the complaint charging the offense and the regularity of the proceedings culminating in the arrest of petitioners are all unchallenged. Petitioners’ only…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hingle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Ex parte BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. BarbeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
- McGary v. PedrorenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Application of CencininoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916