Legal Opinion

Bleakley v. Priest Rapids Irrigation District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1932No. Nos. 23654, 23655. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

J. F. Bleakley and other owners of land in the Priest Rapids Irrigation District brought an action to enjoin the district from issuing and selling bonds and to have the plaintiffs’ land excluded from the district. The board of directors of the district instituted an action to obtain confirmation of a bond issue proposed by the district. A trial to the court of the two causes, which were consolidated, resulted in judgment of dismissal of the first action and a decree of confirmation in the second cause. From those judgments, plaintiffs in the Bleakley action, who were defendants in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adamson v. Black Rock Power & Irrigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  2. Hanson v. Kittitas Reclamation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Benham v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Board of Directors of the Horse Heaven Irrigation District v. MineahWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Hand v. El Dorado Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pueblo ex rel. Sancho Bonet v. Russell & Co., S. en C.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
  2. People v. Russell & Co., (S. en C.)Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
  3. Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Washoe County Water Conservation District v. Reno Press Brick Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API