Legal Opinion · Dissent

Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 13, 1942No. 95Published

1DissentJustice Douglas

There was no provision whatsoever in the grant of these water rights exempting them from any form of taxation. Hence if no contract had been made and the irrigation system had been constructed and respondent’s lands had been serviced in precisely the same way as *620was done here, I should think that there would be no doubt but that the assessment would be valid. The Supreme Court of Puerto Rico relied for the validity of the assessment on such cases as Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation District, 16 Ida. 217, 235, 101 P. 81, 87, and Bleakley v. Priest Rapids Irrigation Dist., 168 Wash. 267, 11 P.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API