Hanson v. Kittitas Reclamation District
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Chapman, J., entered October 9, 1912, in favor of the defendants, upon the pleadings, in an action for equitable relief.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The appellants, plaintiffs below, severally own tracts of land situated within the boundaries of the Kittitas reclamation district. By this action, they seek to have their lands excluded therefrom, and to have the officers of the district enjoined from levying taxes, assessments or other charges on behalf of the district which will encumber or *302cloud the title to their lands. To the complaint, an answer was interposed, and to the answer, a reply. When the ease was called for trial on the issues as thus made, the defendants, respondents here, moved for judgment upon the pleadings. This motion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Andrews v. Lillian Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- In re Petition of SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Kinkade v. WitheropWashington Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nebraska Mid-State Reclamation District v. Hall CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Bleakley v. Priest Rapids Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Rose v. KimballWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Stevens v. LaffertyArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Board of Directors of the Horse Heaven Irrigation District v. MineahWashington Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.