Legal Opinion
Bankers' Utilities Co. v. Pacific Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 15, 1929No. 5651PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
By our decision in Bankers’ Utilities Co. and others v. Pacific National Bank and others (No. 4981) 18 F.(2d) 16, reversing the decree below, we sustained the validity of the Greer patent, No. 1,460,716, for a book form coin receptacle or savings bank with detachable cover. Petitions for a rehearing and certiorari having been denied, the mandate went down and was filed in the District Court on October 18, 1927, directing that the decree in that court be vacated and that further proceedings be taken not out of harmony with our 'opinion. Accordingly on October 26, 1927,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Imhaeuser v. BuerkSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Lourie Implement Co. v. LenhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Bankers' Utilities Co. v. Pacific Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Stebler v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- Rip Van Winkle Wall Bed Co. v. Murphy Wall Bed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Turner Dairy Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Bankers' Utilities Co. v. National Bank Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Zell v. Bankers' Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Greer v. EricksenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Greer v. EricksonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1936