Legal Opinion

Bankers' Utilities Co. v. National Bank Supply Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1931No. 6381PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, District Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying a temporary injunction to restrain the making of what are called book form savings banks, which the appellants claim are an infringement of letters patent No. 1,460,716, claim 6. This patent was first construed by this court in Bankers’ Utilities Co. v. Pacific National Bank, 18 F.(2d) 16. It was there held that all of the claims of the patent, except claim 6, were invalid, as showing no invention over the prior art. The court, by the late Judge Dietrich, declared that all of the elements involved were old,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bankers' Utilities Co. v. Pacific Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  2. Bankers' Utilities Co. v. Pacific Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kobell v. Suburban Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Gerald A. Brown v. Pacific Telephone And Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Brown v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  4. Zell v. Bankers' Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Kobell v. Suburban Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API