Legal Opinion
Rip Van Winkle Wall Bed Co. v. Murphy Wall Bed Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 13, 1924No. 4214PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs (appellees here) brought suit in the lower court against defendant (appellant here) for the alleged infringement of plaintiffs’ patent for improvements in concealed or disappearing beds. The original number of plaintiffs’ patent is 1,007,596 dated October 31, 1911; a reissued patent numbered 13,428 is dated June 11, 1912, and is the patent in suit.
On April 8, 1911, W. L. Murphy filed an application for other improvements in disappearing beds. The patent issued June 18, 1912, upon this application, is numbered 1,030,201. The patent is not in suit, but the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Smith v. Vulcan Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Kings County Raisin & Fruit Co. v. United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Directoplate Corp. v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Darsyn Laboratories, Inc. v. Lenox Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
- Hy-Lo Unit & Metal Products Co. v. Remote Control Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Mantz v. KerstingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
- Gladding-McBean Corporation v. N. Clark & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.