Sprague v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENNAMER, District Judge.
This action was instituted for the recovery of damages for injuries received by plaintiff while a passenger on one of defendant’s trains. Upon the conclusion of the trial of the case, the trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for nominal damages. Plaintiff was granted 42 days in which to prepare and file a motion for a new trial, but the record does not contain any such motion, and fails to disclose that any such motion was filed or passed upon by the trial court. It should be observed that the case was tried on the 9th day of September, 1924, that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Camden Iron Works Co. v. SaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Benitez v. Bank of Nova ScotiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Robie v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Muckelroy v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Brady v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1932